Tuesday, April 22, 2025


Your Daily News Update About CALABARZON and Beyond.
ISSN 2799-1911

Home Blog Page 29

Egypt opposes Trump’s plan to relocate Palestinians as Israel prepares for implementation

CAIRO. Egypt has launched a diplomatic campaign against a controversial proposal by former U.S. President Donald Trump to relocate Palestinians from Gaza, warning that the plan could destabilize the region and threaten its long-standing peace treaty with Israel. Meanwhile, Israel has begun preparations for the mass departure of Palestinians, despite widespread international opposition.

Trump’s administration initially presented the plan as a permanent resettlement but later softened its stance, claiming that the relocation would be temporary. However, officials have yet to provide concrete details.

In a social media post on Thursday, Trump stated that Palestinians would be “resettled in far safer and more beautiful communities, with new and modern homes,” and that the United States would take charge of Gaza’s redevelopment. He emphasized that no American troops would be needed for this effort. Hours later, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio reaffirmed that the relocations would be temporary, with Palestinians staying “somewhere else in the interim” while Gaza is rebuilt.

Palestinian and Regional Backlash

Palestinians have vehemently rejected Trump’s proposal, fearing they will never be allowed to return. Egypt has strongly opposed the plan, calling it a “blatant violation” of international law and warning that it could undermine ceasefire negotiations and peace efforts across the Middle East.

“This behavior provokes the return of hostilities and poses risks on the entire region and the foundations of peace,” the Egyptian government stated on Thursday.

Saudi Arabia, a key U.S. ally, has also denounced any mass displacement of Palestinians, linking its rejection to the broader issue of Palestinian statehood. Riyadh insists that normalization of relations with Israel—a major goal of Trump’s foreign policy—will not occur without the creation of a Palestinian state that includes Gaza.

Despite Israel and Trump’s insistence that the proposed relocation is voluntary, Palestinians across the political spectrum have vowed to remain in their homeland. Human Rights Watch and other organizations have condemned the plan, arguing that it constitutes “ethnic cleansing.”

Israel Begins Preparations Amid Uncertainty

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced on Thursday that he has directed the military to prepare for the mass emigration of Palestinians through land crossings, as well as “special arrangements for exit by sea and air.” However, there were no immediate signs of such preparations on the ground.

Israeli officials have not disclosed how they would respond if Palestinians refuse to leave, leaving significant uncertainty around the plan’s feasibility.

Egypt’s Diplomatic Push

Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi has not publicly responded to Trump’s proposal, which aims to relocate Gaza’s 2.3 million residents and place the U.S. in charge of reconstruction. However, behind the scenes, Egypt has been engaging in intense diplomatic efforts to block the initiative.

Egyptian officials, speaking anonymously, revealed that Cairo has communicated its opposition to the Pentagon, the State Department, and members of the U.S. Congress. The message has also been conveyed to Israel and key European allies, including Britain, France, and Germany.

A Western diplomat in Cairo, also speaking anonymously, confirmed that Egypt views the plan as a direct threat to its national security and has delivered strong objections through multiple channels. Egypt had previously rejected similar proposals from the Biden administration and European governments, but Trump’s public endorsement of the idea has intensified diplomatic tensions.

Hamas, which still controls much of Gaza, has condemned the proposal, warning that any U.S. takeover of the territory would be considered an occupation. The militant group has not yet indicated whether this dispute will affect ongoing ceasefire negotiations, including the next scheduled exchange of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners on Saturday.

Regional Unity Against Forced Relocation

When Trump first announced his proposal, he described it as a way to permanently relocate most of Gaza’s population to other countries, allowing the U.S. to transform the territory into a “Riviera of the Middle East.” Egyptian officials, however, have dismissed the notion that relocation is necessary for reconstruction, reiterating their commitment to the creation of a Palestinian state encompassing Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem.

Israel, which opposes Palestinian statehood, has insisted on maintaining open-ended security control over Gaza and the West Bank. It has also formally annexed East Jerusalem, which remains unrecognized by most of the international community.

Last week, Egypt hosted a high-level meeting with top diplomats from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. These countries, all of which have played a role in past U.S.-brokered agreements with Israel, collectively rejected any forced transfer of Palestinians from Gaza or the West Bank.

In an editorial on Thursday, Egypt’s state-run newspaper, Al-Ahram, warned that “the Arab countries’ independence, their peoples’ unity, and their territorial integrity are under grave threat.”

As tensions rise, Egypt’s strong opposition to Trump’s plan underscores the broader regional resistance to any mass displacement of Palestinians, reinforcing the growing diplomatic divide over Gaza’s future.

Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte impeached over assassination remarks and corruption allegations

MANILA. Vice President Sara Duterte of the Philippines was impeached on Wednesday, facing serious accusations including a plot to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., widespread corruption, and failure to strongly condemn China’s actions in the South China Sea. The impeachment deepens the rift between Duterte and Marcos, two of the country’s most prominent political figures.

The impeachment was spearheaded by legislators in the House of Representatives, many of whom are loyal to Marcos. This move highlights the ongoing political discord between the two leaders, who ran on a platform of unity in the 2022 elections. Duterte, the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, has repeatedly clashed with Marcos and his family, accusing them of corruption, weak leadership, and suppressing her potential bid for the presidency in 2028.

In total, 215 legislators signed the impeachment complaint, surpassing the threshold required to send the petition to the Senate, which would serve as a tribunal for her trial. Among the signatories were President Marcos’s son, Representative Sandro Marcos, and House Speaker Martin Romualdez. The petition called for the Senate to shift into an impeachment court, convict Duterte, remove her from office, and bar her from holding any future public office.

The complaint alleges that Duterte’s actions have “clearly displayed gross faithlessness against public trust” and her “gross unfitness to hold public office.” It also accuses her of a “tyrannical abuse of power” during her time in office.

The impeachment primarily focuses on a controversial statement made by Duterte in November 2023, in which she suggested that she had contracted an assassin to kill Marcos, his wife, and Romualdez if she were to be killed. Although Duterte later clarified that she was not threatening them, the comment sparked national security concerns and led to an investigation.

In addition to the assassination remarks, Duterte faces allegations of corruption and misuse of her office’s funds. A House investigation revealed the alleged misuse of 612.5 million pesos ($10.5 million) in confidential and intelligence funds allocated to her office while serving as vice president and education secretary. The investigation also pointed to unexplained wealth and her failure to disclose assets as required by law.

The impeachment petition also criticized Duterte for undermining the Marcos administration’s policies, particularly in relation to the South China Sea disputes. The vice president’s remarks calling the government’s handling of territorial disputes with China a “fiasco” and her silence on China’s aggressive actions in the region were noted as key points of contention.

The complaint also described Duterte’s “evasiveness and silence” on the West Philippine Sea issue as being in stark contrast to her vocal stance on other matters.

Duterte has yet to respond publicly to the impeachment but her brother, Representative Paolo Duterte, called the move a “clear act of political persecution” aimed at sidelining her. He criticized rival lawmakers for quickly gathering signatures and pushing what he called a “baseless impeachment case” to the Senate.

The impeachment of Vice President Duterte marks a new chapter in the ongoing political drama that continues to unfold in the Philippines as tensions rise between two of the country’s most powerful political families.

PH embassy sa Japan nagbabala sa pagdami ng kaso ng influenza

Nagbabala ang Philippine Embassy sa Japan sa mga Pilipinong naninirahan at bumibiyahe sa bansa kaugnay ng pagtaas ng kaso ng influenza o trangkaso.

Ayon sa embahada, dapat magsuot ng face mask ang mga Pilipino, lalo na sa matataong lugar at pampublikong transportasyon, upang maprotektahan ang sarili laban sa virus. Pinayuhan din ang mga biyahero na kumuha ng travel insurance bilang paghahanda sakaling magkaroon ng hindi inaasahang gastusing medikal.

Bukod dito, pinaalalahanan ang mga Pilipino na manatiling updated sa mga pampublikong abiso at manatili sa bahay kung makakaranas ng sintomas ng trangkaso.

Para sa mga emerhensiya, maaaring tawagan ang:
📍 Philippine Embassy sa Tokyo – 080-4928-7979
📍 Consulate General sa Osaka – 090-4036-7984
📍 Consulate General sa Nagoya – 090-6580-6724

Patuloy na pinaaalalahanan ang lahat na mag-ingat at sumunod sa mga health protocols upang maiwasan ang lalo pang pagkalat ng sakit.

Samantala, nagdadalamhati ang entertainment industry matapos pumanaw ang sikat na Taiwanese actress na bumida sa seryeng Meteor Garden. Ayon sa mga ulat, nagkasakit siya ng influenza matapos bumiyahe ang kanyang pamilya sa Japan, at kalaunan ay nagkaroon ng malalang komplikasyon na naging sanhi ng kanyang pagkamatay. Ang kanyang biglaang pagkawala ay nagdulot ng matinding lungkot sa kanyang mga tagahanga sa buong mundo.

Trump’s Gaza takeover proposal sparks global backlash

WASHINGTON/CAIRO. The Trump administration faced intense international criticism following President Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to relocate Palestinians out of Gaza and initiate a U.S.-led reconstruction of the war-ravaged enclave. While his top aides defended the plan, they also softened some elements in response to widespread condemnation.

Trump, a former New York property mogul, triggered sharp rebukes from world powers, including Russia, China, and Germany, with German officials warning that the plan would cause “new suffering and new hatred.” Saudi Arabia outright rejected the proposal.

In a White House statement on Tuesday, Trump outlined his vision of turning Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East,” emphasizing international cooperation in rebuilding the territory after 16 months of Israeli bombardment that has left over 47,000 Palestinians dead, according to local authorities.

White House Clarifies Stance

At a briefing on Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the plan as “historic, outside-of-the-box thinking.” However, she clarified that the U.S. was not committing to deploying “boots on the ground” in Gaza but refused to rule out potential military involvement.

Additionally, Leavitt walked back Trump’s initial suggestion of permanently resettling Gazans in neighboring countries, stating that any relocations would be “temporary” for reconstruction purposes. Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed this sentiment, saying the intention was for Gazans to leave the territory only for an “interim” period to facilitate rebuilding efforts.

Despite the adjustments, many critics questioned whether Trump was serious about the proposal or merely using it as a bargaining tool. His first term saw a pattern of extreme foreign policy pronouncements, many of which were never implemented.

Global and Domestic Opposition

Trump’s son-in-law and former adviser, Jared Kushner, previously described Gaza as valuable waterfront property, an idea Trump reiterated on Tuesday while advocating for the permanent resettlement of over two million Palestinians.

Critics argue that the proposal could violate international law and human rights, with some describing it as “ethnic cleansing.”

“Everybody loves it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, though polling data suggests that most Americans oppose further military entanglements in conflict zones after long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Reactions from lawmakers varied. Democratic legislators denounced the plan, while some Republicans voiced skepticism. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) posted on X (formerly Twitter), “I thought we voted for America first. We have no business contemplating yet another occupation to doom our treasure and spill our soldiers’ blood.”

During a visit to Guatemala, Secretary Rubio framed the proposal as a “generous” move demonstrating “the willingness of the United States to become responsible for the reconstruction of that area.” In contrast, Leavitt stated that U.S. taxpayers would not fund the rebuilding, claiming Trump would strike deals with regional partners.

Middle East Reaction and Palestinian Resistance

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who met with U.S. Vice President JD Vance on Wednesday, did not directly address Trump’s proposal but praised the president for considering new approaches. Jordan’s King Abdullah, set to meet with Trump next week, rejected any attempts to displace Palestinians.

Egypt, which brokered a ceasefire on January 19, signaled support for Gaza’s reconstruction but insisted that Palestinians must not be forced to leave the territory.

In Gaza, residents expressed outrage. “Trump can go to hell, with his ideas, with his money, and with his beliefs. We are going nowhere. We are not some of his assets,” said Samir Abu Basel, a father of five displaced by the war.

U.S. Military Considerations and International Law

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicated that the Pentagon was exploring “all options” regarding Gaza, leading analysts to speculate that any implementation of Trump’s plan would require a significant U.S. military presence in the region.

Hamas, which governed Gaza before the conflict, dismissed Trump’s proposal as “ridiculous and absurd.” Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri warned, “Any ideas of this kind are capable of igniting the region.” The group remains committed to its ceasefire agreement with Israel but continues to negotiate terms for the next phase of the truce.

Trump’s proposal also raises questions about Saudi Arabia’s willingness to engage in U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to normalize relations with Israel. The kingdom’s foreign ministry reaffirmed its commitment to Palestinian statehood and rejected any forced displacement of Palestinians.

Israeli far-right politician Itamar Ben-Gvir supported Trump’s suggestion, urging Netanyahu to adopt a policy of encouraging Palestinian emigration from Gaza “immediately.”

Secretary-General António Guterres cautioned against reckless proposals at a United Nations committee meeting: “In the search for solutions, we must not make the problem worse. It is vital to stay true to the bedrock of international law. It is essential to avoid any form of ‘ethnic cleansing.’”

As Trump’s proposal continues to face scrutiny, its feasibility remains uncertain, and its potential geopolitical consequences could reshape U.S. involvement in the Middle East for years to come.

Kandidatong congressman sa Laguna inaresto

CALAMBA CITY, Laguna. Dinampot ng mga awtoridad ang isang negosyante na tumatakbo bilang kongresista sa Calamba City, Laguna para sa 2025 midterm elections habang dumadalo sa isang pagdinig sa Municipal Hall of Justice nitong Lunes ng umaga.

Kinilala ang inarestong suspek na si Eugiene Salom, 37, alyas “Gino,” na mas kilala sa bansag na “Batang Calamba” ng kanyang mga tagasuporta. Ayon kay Lt. Col. Victor Sobrepeña, hepe ng Calamba Police Station, hindi na nanlaban si Salom nang siya’y arestuhin bandang 9:30 AM sa harap ng Municipal Trial Court, Branch 3 sa Barangay Real, Calamba City.

Ang pag-aresto ay isinagawa sa bisa ng warrant of arrest na inilabas ni Hon. Krisandra Ann Del Mundo Malalauan, acting presiding judge ng MTC, Branch 3, Fourth Judicial Region, Calamba City noong Enero 30, 2025. Inakusahan si Salom ng paglabag sa Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 o Bouncing Checks Law.

Batay sa ulat ng pulisya, si Salom ay nakalista bilang Number 8 City Level Most Wanted Person, at may itinakdang piyansang ₱120,000 para sa kanyang pansamantalang kalayaan.

“Nasa kustodiya na natin ang akusado at sumasailalim sa booking procedure,” ayon kay Sobrepeña. Matapos ang proseso, agad namang nagpiyansa si Salom upang makalaya pansamantala.

Samantala, sa isang panayam sa telepono, mariing itinanggi ni Salom ang paratang laban sa kanya at iginiit na ang pag-aresto sa kanya ay bahagi ng “maruming pulitika.”

Sweden’s deadliest mass shooting: At least 10 killed at adult education center in Örebro

ÖREBRO, SWEDEN. At least 10 people, including the gunman, were killed on Tuesday in a mass shooting at Campus Risbergska, an adult education center in Örebro. Authorities described the incident as Sweden’s worst mass shooting, though the final death toll and motive remain undetermined.

Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson condemned the attack, calling it “the worst mass shooting in Swedish history.” Speaking at a press conference in Stockholm, he said, “Today, we have witnessed brutal, deadly violence against completely innocent people. Many questions remain unanswered, and I cannot provide those answers either. But the time will come when we will know what happened, how it could occur, and what motives may have been behind it. Let us not speculate.”

The shooting took place on the outskirts of Örebro, about 200 kilometers (125 miles) west of Stockholm. Campus Risbergska serves students over 20 years old and offers vocational training, Swedish language courses for immigrants, and programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Teacher Lena Warenmark, who was present at the time of the attack, told SVT News that she heard approximately ten gunshots. “There were unusually few students on campus after the national exam,” she said.

According to police reports, the gunman was among those killed. The authorities believe he acted alone and stated that he was not previously known to law enforcement. While terrorism has not been suspected at this stage, investigators have not ruled out any possibilities.

Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer described the shooting as “an event that shakes our entire society to its core.” He added, “We have read about such violence happening elsewhere, but Sweden never expected something of this scale. It is indescribably sad.”

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also condemned the attack, writing on social media: “What happened today in Örebro is truly horrifying. Such violence and terror have no place in our societies—least of all in schools. In this dark hour, we stand with the people of Sweden.”

Swedish King Carl XVI Gustaf expressed his sorrow and extended condolences to the victims’ families. “It is with sadness and dismay that my family and I have received the information about the terrible atrocity in Örebro,” he said in a statement. “We send our condolences tonight to the families and friends of the deceased. Our thoughts at this time also go to the injured and their relatives, as well as to others affected.”

Neighboring Denmark also reacted to the tragedy, with Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen calling it “a terrible situation.” Speaking in London after a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, she said, “I am so sad, and all my thoughts are with the victims and their families and with the entire Swedish community and society. It’s a terrible situation. And of course, our neighboring countries have all of our support.”

The damage at the crime scene was so extensive that investigators have yet to determine the final number of fatalities. Örebro police chief Roberto Eid Forest confirmed that authorities are still working to identify the victims and establish a clear timeline of events. “Of course, we all want to understand why this happened, what occurred, and what motives the perpetrator may have had,” Kristersson said. “We will have to wait for those answers—in due time, the picture will become clearer.”

Following the attack, police raided the suspect’s home, but officials have not disclosed what was found. Eid Forest added that there were no warning signs before the shooting.

The attack occurred just after many students had left campus following a national exam. Witnesses reported chaos as students and staff scrambled to find shelter. Andreas Sundling, 28, who was inside the building at the time, told Expressen newspaper, “We heard three bangs and loud screams.” He and others barricaded themselves inside a classroom for safety.

As Sweden grapples with this unprecedented tragedy, the nation awaits further details from authorities while mourning the lives lost in what is now considered the country’s deadliest mass shooting.

Trump proposes U.S. takeover of Gaza Strip, sparking global controversy

WASHINGTON. In a surprising announcement, U.S. President Donald Trump declared that the United States intends to take over the Gaza Strip, reshape its economy, and permanently resettle Palestinians elsewhere—a radical departure from decades of U.S. policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Trump made the statement during a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, following an earlier proposal suggesting that Palestinians from Gaza be relocated to neighboring countries.

“The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it too,” Trump said. “We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site.”

A Vision for Economic Transformation?

Trump outlined a vision where Gaza, long devastated by conflict, would be redeveloped into a thriving economic hub.

“If it’s necessary, we’ll do that. We’re going to take over that piece, we’re going to develop it, create thousands and thousands of jobs, and it’ll be something that the entire Middle East can be very proud of,” he added.

He also suggested that Gaza could become a new home for “the world’s people” and envisioned it as “The Riviera of the Middle East.”

Netanyahu, whose administration has led Israel’s prolonged military campaign against Hamas militants in Gaza, commended Trump’s unconventional approach.

“He is thinking outside the box with fresh ideas,” Netanyahu said. “He is showing willingness to puncture conventional thinking.”

Questions Over Authority and International Law

Trump’s announcement immediately raised serious legal and geopolitical concerns. He did not provide specifics when asked under what authority the U.S. could assume control over Gaza.

“I do see a long-term ownership position, and I see it bringing great stability to that part of the Middle East,” Trump responded. He also claimed that regional leaders supported the idea but did not name any.

Critics, however, warn that Trump’s proposal violates international law, as forced displacement of Palestinians could be considered a form of ethnic cleansing.

Senior Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri condemned Trump’s comments, stating:

“We consider them a recipe for generating chaos and tension in the region because the people of Gaza will not allow such plans to pass.”

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia issued a statement rejecting any forced displacement of Palestinians, reiterating that normalization with Israel would not occur without the establishment of a Palestinian state.

An Unclear Path Forward

Trump’s remarks come as the U.S. and its allies discuss the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, and broader efforts toward regional peace.

While the White House has yet to release details on the implementation of Trump’s plan, the proposal has already fueled intense debate both in Washington and internationally.

As the world watches, questions remain unanswered:

  • How would the U.S. physically occupy and govern Gaza?
  • Where would the displaced Palestinian population go?
  • Would U.S. allies and regional powers support or reject this unprecedented move?

For now, Trump’s unexpected vision has upended diplomatic conversations—leaving the future of Gaza even more uncertain.

PNP Chief Marbil vows tighter security for peaceful and credible 2025 elections

MANILA. Philippine National Police (PNP) Chief, Police General Rommel Francisco D. Marbil, reaffirmed the PNP’s commitment to ensuring a secure and fair electoral process as the country prepares for the May 2025 elections

Speaking at the Manila Overseas Press Club’s (MOPC) “COMELEC and PNP Night: The Game Changer – Peace and Order and May 2025 Elections” on February 4, PGen. Marbil, alongside Commission on Elections (COMELEC) Chairman Hon. George Erwin M. Garcia, discussed the evolving security landscape ahead of the national polls. The event, held at Marco Polo Club in Makati, brought together media professionals, law enforcement officials, and election stakeholders.

Tackling Old and New Election Threats

PGen. Marbil emphasized that while traditional threats such as “Guns, Goons, and Gold” remain a challenge, a modern adversary has emerged—Fake News.

“The proliferation of illegal firearms and the presence of private armed groups (PAGs) continue to endanger the electoral process,” he warned. To counter these threats, the PNP has intensified its operations against loose firearms and election-related violence. He also pointed to vote-buying and other corrupt practices, stressing that law enforcement must work closely with the COMELEC to uphold the integrity of the elections.

Beyond physical threats, PGen. Marbil highlighted the dangers of cybercrime and disinformation, which he said have the potential to manipulate public perception and disrupt democracy. With the rapid spread of fake news and digital propaganda, the PNP is bolstering its cybersecurity measures to curb misinformation that could mislead voters and undermine the electoral process.

Commitment to a Secure Election

PGen. Marbil assured the public that the PNP remains steadfast in its duty to safeguard the peace, credibility, and fairness of the 2025 elections. He emphasized that a whole-of-government approach, involving the PNP, COMELEC, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), and other agencies, is essential in securing democracy.

“As the country moves closer to election season, every effort is being made to ensure that the people’s will is upheld—without fear, violence, or manipulation,” he stated.

With the PNP ramping up its security efforts, the 2025 elections are set to be a critical test of the country’s ability to combat both traditional and digital threats to democracy.

Mayor Vic Amante, nanguna sa unang public consultation sa posibleng paglipat ng mga tanggapan ng pamahalaang lungsod

0

SAN PABLO CITY. Pinangunahan ni City Mayor Vic Amante ang unang pampublikong konsultasyon hinggil sa posibleng paglilipat ng mga tanggapan ng pamahalaang lungsod mula sa lumang City Hall compound sa Barangay VA patungo sa bagong City Government Compound sa Barangay San Jose.

Ginanap ang konsultasyon sa Convention Center, kung saan dumalo ang mayorya ng Sangguniang Panglungsod upang masaksihan at talakayin ang panukalang hakbang. Sa kanyang mensahe, ipinaliwanag ni Mayor Amante ang layunin ng inisyatiba at ang posibleng benepisyo nito sa epektibong paglilingkod sa mamamayan.

“Ang layunin natin ay mas mapahusay ang serbisyo-publiko at masiguro na ang mga tanggapan ng pamahalaan ay nasa isang mas maayos, moderno, at accessible na lokasyon para sa lahat,” ani Amante.

Tinalakay rin sa pagdinig ang mga hamon na maaaring kaharapin sa paglilipat, kabilang na ang gastos, legal na proseso, at epekto sa mga empleyado at residente. Nagkaroon ng bukas na forum kung saan maaaring magpahayag ng kanilang pananaw ang mga mamamayan.

Ang lumang gusali ng City Hall, na itinayo noong 1940, ay idinisenyo noong panahong kakaunti pa lamang ang mga sasakyan at ang pangunahing transportasyon ay kalesa at karitela. Dahil sa paglago ng lungsod, nagdudulot ito ng matinding pagsisikip ng trapiko sa paligid. Ang planong paglilipat ay bahagi ng inisyatiba upang maibsan ang problema sa daloy ng trapiko at mapabuti ang serbisyo ng pamahalaang lungsod.

Ang pampublikong konsultasyon ay isang mahalagang bahagi ng proseso ng desisyon ng lokal na pamahalaan, na nagbibigay-daan sa transparency at partisipasyon ng publiko.

Ginanap ang konsultasyon sa Convention Center, kung saan dumalo ang mayorya ng Sangguniang Panglungsod upang masaksihan at talakayin ang panukalang hakbang.

Photo credits: Roy Tomandao

Ancient Greece holds oldest evidence of lead pollution, study finds

WASHINGTON. Ancient Greece, known for its groundbreaking contributions to democracy and philosophy, has now been revealed as the source of the earliest known evidence of lead pollution in the environment, dating back around 5,200 years. This discovery, made by researchers studying sediment cores from mainland Greece and the Aegean Sea, significantly predates the previous earliest recorded lead pollution by 1,200 years, which was found in a peat bog in Serbia.

Lead pollution in ancient Greece originated from the smelting of ore for copper and silver, a process that released toxic lead into the atmosphere. This lead would later settle as dust onto the soil. According to Joseph Maran, an archaeologist from Heidelberg University and co-author of the study published in Communications Earth and Environment, “Silver was used for jewelry, for special objects — but it wasn’t found in a pure state,” meaning it was often mined as part of an ore mixed with lead.

The earliest signs of lead contamination were found in northeastern Greece, near the island of Thasos, a key site for silver mining and metalworking in antiquity. Maran noted that Thasos was one of the region’s most significant locations for these activities.

Historian Joseph Manning of Yale, who was not involved in the study, stated, “Lead released from smelting is the world’s first form of toxic or industrial pollution.”

The study shows that while lead contamination was relatively low and localized throughout the Bronze Age, Classical Period, and Hellenistic period — eras known for the rise of Athenian democracy, the philosophical teachings of Socrates and Plato, and Greece’s cultural influence across the Mediterranean — things changed around 2,150 years ago. The researchers observed a sudden spike in lead emissions that coincided with the Roman conquest of Greece in 146 B.C.

Andreas Koutsodendris, co-author of the study, explained that the Roman expansion led to an increase in silver coin production, which required smelting processes that released higher levels of lead. “Roman trade, colonies, and shipping expanded across the Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea, and the demand for silver coins grew rapidly,” said Koutsodendris.

Later, the Romans used lead not only in coin production but also for tableware and in construction materials, such as pipes. Previous research, including ice core analyses from Greenland, also detected elevated lead levels during Roman times across much of the Northern Hemisphere. However, this new study provides a more detailed and localized view of how lead levels fluctuated during that period.

Nathan Chellman, an environmental scientist at the University of Nevada, Reno, who was not part of the research team, emphasized the significance of the findings, stating that the study “adds a more specific and local picture to how lead levels changed.”

This discovery sheds new light on the early environmental impact of human industrial activities and how the ancient world contributed to the emergence of toxic pollution.