Thursday, April 24, 2025


Your Daily News Update About CALABARZON and Beyond.
ISSN 2799-1911

Home Blog Page 58

Mary Jane Veloso, Pinay na iniligtas sa bitay, uuwi na matapos ang dekada ng negosasyon

MAYNILA. Matapos ang mahigit isang dekada ng negosasyon, inihayag ni Pangulong Ferdinand Marcos Jr. na iuuwi na sa Pilipinas si Mary Jane Veloso, isang Filipina na naligtas mula sa pagbitay sa Indonesia noong 2015 dahil sa kasong drug trafficking.

“Pagkatapos ng mahigit isang dekada ng diplomasiya at konsultasyon sa gobyerno ng Indonesia, nagawa nating maantala ang kanyang bitay hanggang sa makabuo ng kasunduan upang maibalik siya sa Pilipinas,” pahayag ni Marcos sa isang opisyal na pahayag nitong Miyerkules.

Si Veloso, isang domestic helper na dalawang anak, ay inaresto noong 2010 sa Yogyakarta matapos mahulihan ang 2.6 kilo ng heroin na nakatago sa kanyang maleta.

Noong 2015, naligtas siya mula sa firing squad sa huling sandali matapos hilingin ng mga opisyal ng Pilipinas kay dating Pangulong Joko Widodo ng Indonesia na hayaang makapagsalaysay si Veloso laban sa mga kasangkot sa sindikato ng human at drug smuggling.

Samantala, walong iba pa ang nahatulan dahil sa droga ang na-execute noong panahong iyon, at sinabi ni Widodo na ang pag-antala sa bitay ni Veloso ay isang “postponement.” Ang termino ni Widodo bilang pangulo ay natapos noong nakaraang buwan.

Ayon kay Pangulong Marcos, ang tagumpay na ito ay sumasalamin sa malalim na ugnayan ng Pilipinas at Indonesia. “This outcome is a reflection of the depth of our nation’s partnership with Indonesia—united in a shared commitment to justice and compassion,” ani Marcos.

“Masaya nating hinihintay ang pagbabalik ni Mary Jane sa kanyang tahanan,” dagdag pa ng pangulo.

Si Veloso ay sumisimbolo ng patuloy na laban para sa hustisya at pagbibigay ng pagkakataon para sa mga naaapi, lalo na sa mga naging biktima ng sindikato.

Movie review: “Red One” tries to supersize the Christmas Movie, but falls short

“Red One” is Amazon’s latest attempt to create a supersized Christmas movie, mixing high-budget action with holiday cheer. Directed by Jake Kasdan, known for the Jumanji reboot, and written by Chris Morgan, the movie aims to reinvent the holiday genre with a superhero-style Santa Claus. The film stars Dwayne Johnson as Callum Drift, Santa’s tough bodyguard, and features an ensemble cast including Chris Evans, J.K. Simmons, and Lucy Liu.

In one of the film’s more bizarre moments, Johnson’s character faces off with a witch-possessed mercenary (Nick Kroll) and ice-sword-wielding CGI snowmen on the sandy beaches of Aruba. This is just one of many wild, over-the-top scenes that characterize the movie, which tries to give a fresh spin to the Christmas tradition. But while it may look flashy, the magic of the season is overshadowed by too many effects and convoluted world-building.

The film imagines Santa as a super-competent, army-like figure who not only runs the North Pole like a military operation but also bench presses and counts carbs. Played by J.K. Simmons, this version of Santa answers critics of his real existence with a tough, superhuman version of the jolly old elf. But the big question is: who exactly asked for a Marvel-ized Santa?

The movie’s plot centers on the kidnapping of Santa, leading Callum to team up with Jack O’Malley (Chris Evans), a down-on-his-luck hacker with a complicated past. Evans’ portrayal of O’Malley, a “level-four naughty-lister,” adds some comedic energy to the film, but it still doesn’t save the movie from feeling overstuffed. The action-packed rescue mission brings in a Christmas Witch, Gryla (Kiernan Shipka), and even Krampus (Kristofer Hivju), Santa’s brother. However, all these elements, alongside trolls, ogres, and a headless horseman, feel like too much crammed into one story.

“Red One” seems to be trying too hard to blend the whimsy of Christmas with action-packed thrills, but it never quite strikes the right balance. While there’s potential for a fun holiday film, the over-reliance on CGI and excessive world-building dilutes what could have been a charming take on the Christmas genre. If anything, it leaves you nostalgic for simpler, more straightforward holiday movies starring Dwayne Johnson, like The Tooth Fairy.

Despite its star power and expansive ambition, “Red One” feels like an unwanted high-priced Christmas gift—shiny on the outside but lacking the warmth inside. With its bloated storyline and too many characters, this is one holiday movie that could have benefited from a little less spectacle and a little more heart.

Rating: 1.5/4 stars
MPAA Rating: PG-13 for action, some violence, and language
Running time: 133 minutes

Marcos, hinikayat ang agarang pagpasa ng panukala sa 2025 budget

MAYNILA. Hinikayat ni Pangulong Ferdinand Marcos Jr. ang agarang pagpasa ng House Bill No. 10800 o ang 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA) sa Senado ng Pilipinas matapos itong sertipikahang urgent.

Sa isang liham na ipinadala kay Senate President Francis Escudero noong Oktubre 29, binigyang-diin ni Marcos ang kahalagahan ng pagpapatibay ng P6.352 trilyong pambansang badyet para sa 2025. Ang panukalang ito, aniya, ay magtitiyak sa “uninterrupted operation of critical government functions, guarantee the allocation of fiscal resources for vital initiatives, and enable the government to adeptly respond to emerging challenges.”

Ang parehong mensahe ay ipinadala rin kay House Speaker Martin Romualdez bilang bahagi ng koordinasyon sa dalawang kapulungan ng Kongreso.

Ang panukalang 2025 budget ay mas mataas ng 9.5% kumpara sa kasalukuyang P5.268 trilyong badyet ng bansa para sa 2024. Layunin nitong tugunan ang mga pangunahing proyekto ng pamahalaan at ang mga hamong kinakaharap ng bansa.

Tinitingnan ng Senado ang kahalagahan ng agarang aksyon para sa panukalang badyet na ito upang matiyak ang maayos na daloy ng serbisyong publiko at tugunan ang patuloy na pangangailangan ng sambayanan.

G20 Summit urges aid for Gaza, peace in Ukraine, and global reforms

0

RIO DE JANEIRO. The G20 summit concluded with a declaration urging an end to global hostilities, including in the Middle East and Ukraine, while calling for increased humanitarian aid to Gaza and comprehensive global reforms. However, the final statement, endorsed by most members, lacked specific details, raising concerns about its effectiveness in addressing pressing global issues.

A Call for Peace Amid Escalating Crises

Leaders at the summit expressed deep concern over ongoing wars, particularly in Gaza and Ukraine, underscoring the dire humanitarian consequences. “Affirming the Palestinian right to self-determination, we reiterate our unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution where Israel and a Palestinian State live side by side in peace,” the declaration stated.

The document emphasized the “catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza” without directly addressing Israeli casualties or the fate of hostages held by Hamas. This omission drew criticism, especially given U.S. President Joe Biden’s consistent stance that “Hamas is solely to blame for the war.” Biden also stressed the importance of bolstering international pressure on Hamas to accept a ceasefire.

In Ukraine, the declaration highlighted the human suffering caused by the conflict while refraining from naming Russia as the aggressor. Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend, so Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov was sent instead.

Push for Taxing Billionaires and U.N. Reform

The declaration proposed transformative reforms to the United Nations Security Council to reflect 21st-century realities, including calls for broader representation from underrepresented regions such as Africa and Latin America. While supported in principle, no concrete timeline or structure for these reforms was agreed upon.

A proposal to tax global billionaires, affecting around 3,000 individuals worldwide, was also included. Despite opposition from Argentina and other nations, the clause aligned with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s push to address global inequality.

Global Hunger in Focus

One of the summit’s key initiatives was Lula’s launch of the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty. The plan, backed by 82 nations and major organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation, aims to tackle rising global hunger. According to U.N. data, a symbolic demonstration on Rio’s Copacabana Beach featured 733 empty plates, representing the 733 million people who faced hunger in 2023.

Critics Demand Action Over Words

While the declaration addressed numerous global crises, experts noted its lack of actionable measures. “It is very much a declaration of goodwill… but we have very few concrete, tangible measures,” said an international relations expert Paulo Velasco.

The G20’s outcomes reflect a balancing act between aspirations for global unity and the realities of geopolitical divisions, leaving much work to be done to translate its commitments into meaningful action.

Moscow warns as U.S. approves Ukraine to strike Russian soil with long-range missiles

KYIV. The Kremlin has issued a stark warning following U.S. President Joe Biden’s decision to permit Ukraine to strike targets on Russian soil using U.S.-supplied longer-range missiles. The move, which Moscow described as adding “fuel to the fire,” raises fears of a broader escalation in the conflict as it nears the 1,000th day since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in 2022.

The change in U.S. policy allows Ukraine to utilize Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS), which can reach up to 300 kilometers (190 miles). This shift comes after months of reluctance from Washington to provide such weapons, citing concerns about provoking direct conflict with Russia or NATO involvement. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticized the decision, stating, “It is obvious that the outgoing administration in Washington intends to take steps… to continue adding fuel to the fire and provoking further escalation of tensions around this conflict.”

The announcement coincided with intensified Russian attacks in Ukraine. A ballistic missile carrying cluster munitions struck a residential area in Sumy, northern Ukraine, killing 11 people and injuring 84, according to Ukraine’s Interior Ministry. Another missile strike in Odesa ignited fires in apartment buildings, leaving at least 10 dead and 43 injured.

Ukrainian officials welcomed the new missile capabilities, with Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha asserting, “The longer Ukraine can strike, the shorter the war will be.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy gave a restrained response, stating, “The missiles will speak for themselves.”

Russia’s U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia expressed outrage during a U.N. Security Council meeting, marking the 1,000th day of the war. “Moscow is astounded that the leaders of Britain and France are eager to play into the hands of the exiting administration and are dragging not just their countries but the entire Europe into large-scale escalation with drastic consequences,” he said.

The policy shift was reportedly prompted by reports of North Korean troops arriving in Russia to aid Moscow’s efforts to repel Ukrainian forces near the Kursk border region. A U.S. official, speaking anonymously, revealed that this development was a key factor in Biden’s decision, which came just before he departed for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Peru.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly warned of the consequences of such actions, stating that allowing Ukraine to target Russian territory with Western weapons would “dramatically change the nature of the conflict” and signal that NATO countries are directly at war with Russia. Putin has also hinted at retaliatory measures, including supplying weapons to other nations for potential use against Western targets.

Russian lawmakers and state media reacted with condemnation. Leonid Slutsky, a senior lawmaker, told Russian news agency RIA Novosti, “Biden, apparently, decided to end his presidential term and go down in history as ‘Bloody Joe.’” Meanwhile, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, a Russian state newspaper, warned, “The madmen who are drawing NATO into a direct conflict with our country may soon be in great pain.”

While some NATO allies supported the U.S. decision, others expressed concern about its implications. Polish President Andrzej Duda called the move “a breakthrough moment,” while Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico criticized it as “an unprecedented escalation.”

Military experts are divided on the potential impact of the ATACMS. Patrick Bury, a security analyst at the University of Bath, suggested that the missiles could slow down Russian offensives but were unlikely to alter the broader trajectory of the war. “The ultimate impact will probably slow down the tempo of the Russian offensives,” he said.

The $1 million banana: Maurizio Cattelan’s ‘Comedian’ and the art world’s most absurd auction

NEW YORK. A banana duct-taped to a wall might seem like an unusual piece of art, but this simple, everyday fruit could soon fetch more than $1 million at an upcoming auction. The piece, titled “Comedian,” by Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan, was first showcased in 2019 at the Art Basel Miami Beach fair, where it quickly became a viral sensation.

The yellow banana affixed to a white wall with silver duct tape is part of a conceptual artwork that has sparked debates across the art world. Some saw it as a playful prank, while others speculated that it was a commentary on the commercialization and absurdity of contemporary art. The piece became so controversial that, at one point, another artist removed and ate the banana, prompting the installation of a replacement. As the crowds for selfies grew thicker, the piece was temporarily removed from display, but three editions of “Comedian” were eventually sold for between $120,000 and $150,000, according to the Perrotin gallery.

Now, “Comedian” has an estimated value of between $1 million and $1.5 million, with an auction scheduled for November 20 at Sotheby’s in New York. David Galperin, Sotheby’s head of contemporary art, described the piece as “profound and provocative.”

“What Cattelan is really doing is turning a mirror to the contemporary art world and asking questions, provoking thought about how we ascribe value to artworks, what we define as an artwork,” Galperin said.

But what exactly are bidders purchasing? Not the same banana that was on display in Miami—the original fruit is long gone. Instead, buyers will acquire a certificate of authenticity that grants the owner the right to reproduce the banana and duct tape on their wall as an original artwork by Cattelan.

“‘Comedian’ is not about the banana itself, but about the permission to recreate it,” Galperin added.

The piece’s title itself hints at the artist’s likely intent not to be taken too seriously. Chloé Cooper Jones, an assistant professor at Columbia University School of the Arts, notes that the artwork’s context should be considered. “Comedian” debuted at an art fair attended by wealthy collectors, where the banana undoubtedly attracted attention on social media. Cooper Jones suggests that Cattelan may have created the work as a challenge for these collectors to invest in something absurd, a commentary on the exclusive and capitalistic nature of the art world.

However, Cooper Jones believes Cattelan’s intention may be deeper than simply poking fun at the elite. Known as a “trickster artist,” Cattelan often uses humor combined with dark themes to provoke thought on deeper societal issues. Cooper Jones pointed out that the banana itself, a commodity with historical ties to imperialism, labor exploitation, and corporate power, could symbolize the darker side of global trade.

“It would be hard to come up with a better, simple symbol of global trade and all of its exploitations than the banana,” Cooper Jones said. “If ‘Comedian’ is about making people think about their moral complicity in the production of objects they take for granted, then it’s at least a more useful tool in terms of the questions that this work could be asking.”

“Comedian” is set to auction alongside one of Claude Monet’s “Water Lilies” paintings, which is expected to fetch around $60 million. When asked to compare Cattelan’s banana to Monet’s iconic work, Galperin noted that impressionism was once met with resistance and discomfort before being embraced as art.

“No important, profound, meaningful artwork of the past 100 or 200 years, or our history for that matter, did not provoke some kind of discomfort when it was first unveiled,” Galperin said.

As the auction date approaches, “Comedian” continues to captivate the art world and spark discussions about value, art, and the absurdity of it all. Will a banana taped to a wall truly be worth millions? Only time will tell.

Signal No. 3 itinaas sa 3 lugar habang lumalabas sa West Philippine Sea si Pepito

MAYNILA. Itinaas ang Tropical Cyclone Wind Signal (TCWS) No. 3 sa tatlong lugar sa bansa habang patuloy na umuusad si Bagyong Pepito (international name: Man-Yi) sa direksyon ng West Philippine Sea, ayon sa ulat ng PAGASA.

Sa isang anunsyo, sinabi ng PAGASA na ang TCWS No. 3 ay ipinataw sa mga sumusunod na lugar:

  • Hilaga at kanlurang bahagi ng Ilocos Sur (kabilang ang mga bayan ng Gregorio del Pilar, Magsingal, San Esteban, Banayoyo, Burgos, Candon City, Santa Lucia, Santiago, San Vicente, Santa Catalina, Lidlidda, Nagbukel, Sinait, Suyo, Sigay, San Ildefonso, Galimuyod, Vigan City, San Emilio, Cabugao, Caoayan, San Juan, Santa, Bantay, Santo Domingo, Tagudin, Santa Cruz, Santa Maria, Narvacan, Salcedo);
  • Hilagang-kanlurang bahagi ng La Union (Luna, Bangar, Balaoan, Bacnotan); at
  • Kanlurang bahagi ng Abra (San Quintin, Langiden, Pidigan, Pilar).

Ayon sa PAGASA, ang mga lugar na nasa ilalim ng TCWS No. 3 ay makararanas ng mga malalakas na hangin na may bilis na 89 hanggang 117 km/h sa loob ng 18 oras, na magdudulot ng katamtaman hanggang malubhang panganib sa buhay at ari-arian.

Samantala, itinaas ang TCWS No. 2 sa mga sumusunod na lugar:

  • Ilocos Norte;
  • Natitirang bahagi ng Ilocos Sur;
  • Natitirang bahagi ng La Union;
  • Pangasinan;
  • Natitirang bahagi ng Abra;
  • Kanlurang bahagi ng Mountain Province (Besao, Tadian, Sagada, Bauko), Benguet; at
  • Hilagang bahagi ng Zambales (Santa Cruz, Candelaria).

Inaasahan sa mga lugar na ito ang malalakas na hangin na may bilis na 62 hanggang 88 km/h sa loob ng 24 na oras, na magdudulot ng maliit hanggang katamtamang panganib sa buhay at ari-arian.

Itinaas din ang TCWS No. 1 sa mga sumusunod na lugar:

  • Apayao;
  • Kalinga;
  • Natitirang bahagi ng Mountain Province;
  • Ifugao;
  • Kanlurang bahagi ng Cagayan (Lasam, Santo Niño, Solana, Enrile, Tuao, Piat, Rizal, Allacapan, Ballesteros, Abulug, Pamplona, Claveria, Santa Praxedes, Sanchez-Mira);
  • Nueva Vizcaya;
  • Hilaga at gitnang bahagi ng Nueva Ecija (Bongabon, San Leonardo, Cabanatuan City, Santa Rosa, Jaen, Cuyapo, Talavera, Santo Domingo, Rizal, Zaragoza, Llanera, Guimba, Aliaga, Pantabangan, Science City of Muñoz, General Mamerto Natividad, Carranglan, Quezon, San Jose City, Lupao, Nampicuan, Talugtug, Licab, San Antonio, Palayan City, Laur);
  • Tarlac; at
  • Gitnang bahagi ng Zambales (Botolan, Iba, Cabangan, Palauig, Masinloc).

Ang mga lugar na ito ay makakaranas ng malalakas na hangin na may bilis na 39 hanggang 61 km/h sa loob ng 36 na oras, na magdudulot ng minimal hanggang maliit na panganib sa buhay at ari-arian.
Ayon sa ulat ng PAGASA, dakong alas-4 ng umaga ng Lunes, ang sentro ni Bagyong Pepito ay matatagpuan 145 km kanlurang bahagi ng Sinait, Ilocos Sur.
Ang bagyo ay may maximum sustained winds na 130 km/h malapit sa sentro, at may mga pagbugso ng hangin na umaabot sa 160 km/h, na may central pressure na 965 hPa. Ang bagyo ay patuloy na umausad patungong hilagang-kanluran sa bilis na 30 km/h.
Mula sa sentro ng bagyo, ang malalakas hanggang bagyong-hangin ay umaabot hanggang 280 km.


Ayon sa PAGASA, magdudulot ng katamtaman hanggang malalakas na pag-ulan (50 hanggang 100 mm) ang bagyo sa mga sumusunod na lugar:

  • Ilocos Sur, La Union, Pangasinan, Benguet, Zambales, Cagayan, Aurora, Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Batanes, at Isabela.
    Maaari ring maging mas mataas ang pag-ulan sa mga kabundukan at mataas na lugar, at maaaring magdulot ng panganib tulad ng pagbaha o pagguho ng lupa.

Samantala, ang Metro Manila, Cagayan Valley, CALABARZON, at natitirang bahagi ng Central Luzon ay magkakaroon ng maulap na kalangitan at paminsang pag-ulan at pagkidlat na dulot ng trough ni Pepito. Ang mga lugar na ito ay maaaring makaranas ng pagbaha o pagguho ng lupa dulot ng katamtaman hanggang minsan ay malalakas na pag-ulan.

Ang iba pang bahagi ng bansa, kabilang ang Eastern Visayas, Caraga, at Davao Region, ay magkakaroon ng bahagyang maulap na kalangitan at kalat-kalat na mga pag-ulan o pagkidlat na dulot ng easterlies. Sa mga malalakas na pagkidlat, posibleng magdulot ito ng flash floods o landslides.

Ang iba pang bahagi ng bansa ay makakaranas ng bahagyang maulap na kalangitan at isolated thunderstorms, kung saan posibleng magkaroon ng flash floods o landslides, lalo na sa mga matinding thunderstorms.Paghahanda at Pag-iingat
Patuloy na pinapayuhan ang mga residente ng mga lugar na nasa ilalim ng mga signal ng bagyo na maghanda para sa posibleng epekto ng bagyong Pepito, kabilang na ang mga posibleng pagbaha at pagguho ng lupa.

Biden approves Ukraine’s use of U.S. weapons for strikes inside Russia

WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. President Joe Biden has authorized Ukraine to use American-made weapons for strikes deep into Russian territory, according to two U.S. officials and a source familiar with the matter. This decision, confirmed on Sunday, marks a critical escalation in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia.

Ukraine is reportedly planning its first long-range attacks in the coming days, though operational details remain classified. This development comes just two months before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20 and after months of appeals from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to expand the scope of Ukraine’s military capabilities using U.S. weapons.

The policy change is largely seen as a response to Russia’s deployment of North Korean ground troops to bolster its forces in the region, a move that has raised alarms in both Washington and Kyiv.

Zelenskyy, in his evening address, hinted at the impending actions without giving specifics. “Today, many in the media are saying that we have received permission to take appropriate actions. But strikes are not made with words. Such things are not announced,” he said, adding that the missiles would “speak for themselves.”

The White House and the U.S. State Department have declined to comment on the decision. The Kremlin has not issued an immediate response, though it has previously warned that allowing Ukraine to use U.S.-made weapons for strikes on Russian territory would be viewed as a major escalation.

Russian officials have expressed strong reactions to the decision. Vladimir Dzhabarov, first deputy head of Russia’s Federation Council International Affairs Committee, warned of dire consequences, stating that the policy shift could lead to “World War Three.” Another senior official, Andrei Klishas, wrote on Telegram that the West’s escalation could result in “the Ukrainian statehood in complete ruins by morning.”

Ukraine’s initial strikes are expected to involve ATACMS rockets, which have a range of up to 190 miles (306 kilometers). Some U.S. officials are skeptical about the long-term impact of the decision, but others believe it could enhance Ukraine’s negotiating position should peace talks resume.

Criticism and praise for the policy reversal have emerged within U.S. political circles. Republican Representative Mike Turner, who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, described the move as overdue. “This first step will put pressure on Vladimir Putin as President-elect Trump returns to the White House and works to end this war,” Turner said.

Meanwhile, questions remain about whether Trump will reverse the decision upon taking office. Trump has long criticized the scale of U.S. military aid to Ukraine and pledged to end the war quickly, though specifics of his approach are unclear. Richard Grenell, one of Trump’s close foreign policy advisers, criticized the decision on social media, stating, “Escalating the wars before he leaves office.”

International allies have also responded to the development. Poland’s Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski called the move a direct response to North Korea’s involvement in the war and Russia’s escalating missile strikes. “President Biden responded to the entry of North Korean troops into the war and the massive Russian missile strike in a language that V. Putin understands—by removing restrictions on Ukraine’s use of Western missiles,” Sikorski said.

With the conflict now poised for further escalation, this decision by the Biden administration underscores the increasingly complex dynamics shaping the Ukraine-Russia war and the broader geopolitical landscape.

Being liked or being respected

0

Being liked makes people happy. Being respected however is more important than being liked, and what matters more makes us happier. Respect is the foundation of good relationships; it is a given and need not be earned in some relationships. Everyone may not like us, but respect shows maturity and integrity in dealing with others no matter how they differ in opinions. That leads to unity in diversity. What if we ask leaders the question of “being liked or being respected”? We want a more respected and smarter answer.

Society these days needs to be people-focused, not leader-focused. True leaders know that when people are more empowered to help themselves, their leadership thrives. People need that sort of leadership training. Having a leader for a long time is not sustainable. A new leader is being trained and it is policy-based like implementing term limits.

What happens to many political leaders is that they launch covert and overt propaganda so that people will always like them. Netizens continue to criticize them through memes, half-meant jokes, and serious posts of sentiments on such leaders. When there is a palpable lack of respect for leaders, chances are they do not adjust their leadership style for the better but launch more and tougher propaganda for self-preservation. Those who oppose them will be considered enemies and will be subjected to black propaganda. (“Lening lutang” is one; the worst thing I have heard is that Filipinos will become even more stupid if she continues to be chosen as a leader.) Trolls are utilized and they usually succeed in terms of preserving their selfish interests.

But they cannot fool assiduous college students who are being exposed to social sciences and the humanities, some core courses of which have been learned in junior and senior high school. They understand that the good qualities of leaders cannot be compromised and there is no room for leaders who only want to be liked. They also abhor seeing such types of leaders when they join their chosen professions of medicine, engineering, business, accounting, and teaching, among others.

Adolf Hitler, Ferdinand Marcos Sr., and Rodrigo Duterte had their own controversial and complicated leadership. Looking at their terms, they have become figures with mixed reactions from the public—some supporters and some critics. The question of whether they were respectful throughout their terms depends on one’s perspective and interpretation, but there are clear aspects that describe their leadership.

The leader of the Nazi Party and Chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945, Hitler cannot be considered a respectable leader in history. He was responsible for starting World War II and the systematic killing of millions of Jews and other minorities under his Nazi ideology. His leadership was opposed and condemned worldwide for heinous human rights crimes, such as the Holocaust. His name has generally been associated with hatred and abuse, and disrespect has been inadvertently promoted in recent decades. (Britannica, n.d.) 

Marcos Sr. was the Philippine President from 1965 to 1986. During his first years in power, he had several economic achievements and built long-lasting infrastructures. But his decision to declare Martial Law in 1972 brought serious consequences for human rights, press freedom, and political democracy. Martial Law was used to tighten his power, impose punishments on opponents, and enrich his already Imeldific family and allies. Allegations of corruption and abuse of power became part of his legacy, including final convictions. Although he still has supporters (his son who is back in Malacañang also receives strong backing from “Marcos’ loyalists”) in some parts of the country, the violence caused by Martial Law and the issues of injustice and a massive amount of foreign debt gave his administration a bad reputation. (“The Transnational Dynamics of the Marcos Plunder,” Aquino, 1999; “Presidential Plunder: The Quest for the Marcos Ill-gotten Wealth,” Salonga, 2000; Amnesty International, 2022)

Another Filipino leader, Duterte, ruled for only six years but it was marked by controversial measures, including the brutal war on drugs that caused thousands of deaths. Although Duterte is proud of his populist style and his achievements in battling criminality, many Filipinos and other nationalities have also criticized him for allegedly violating human rights and having authoritarian tendencies. He has garnered significant support from supporters for his anti-drug policies, but his leadership style has come under fire from international human rights groups and political opponents. His language and statements are also sometimes controversial and do not correspond to the standards of diplomatic and political discipline, so respect for him varies depending on the person’s point of view. The Tokhang approach in his drug war has a notorious record and is not respectable either. An understatement? Here: “The war on drugs took away our dignity, we were stripped of our dignity (inalisan kami ng dignidad),” said Mary Ann Domingo, who lost her husband and son in 2016, relating how Tokhang-operating cops rushed into the privacy of their home and dragged them by force at the dead of night. (“Families of drug war victims demand justice during House EJK probe,” PNA, 2024)

Overall, the three leaders had aspects of leadership that received different reactions from their subordinates. Each of them has supporters and critics, but looking at the overall impact of their leadership, it is undeniable that they are NOT the most respected leaders in world history—especially because of the issues of human rights, freedom, and democratic governance.

If the leaders are men and women of integrity, they are likely to be liked and respected at the same time. We can hope and pray both ways.

Brazil’s first lady insults Elon Musk during G20 event

RIO DEL JANAIRO, Brazil. Brazil’s First Lady, Janja Lula da Silva, stirred up a storm of reactions after swearing at billionaire Elon Musk during a G20 social gathering on Saturday. The event, held ahead of the upcoming G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro, was centered on discussions about regulating social media to combat misinformation.

While addressing the audience, a ship’s horn interrupted her speech, prompting her to joke, “I think it’s Elon Musk,” followed by the remark, “I’m not afraid of you, fuck you, Elon Musk.”

The comment quickly went viral after Musk, owner of the social media platform X, reacted by sharing a laughing emoji graphic on his platform. He later posted another statement saying, “They are going to lose the next election,” in an apparent reference to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, her husband.

Janja’s speech came against the backdrop of Brazil’s recent efforts to hold social media platforms accountable for spreading misinformation. Musk’s platform, X, has faced scrutiny in Brazil, including a one-month suspension earlier this year for non-compliance with local laws. Authorities accused the platform of failing to designate a legal representative in the country and ignoring court orders to take down accounts disseminating “fake news” and hate messages.

The G20 summit, scheduled for Monday and Tuesday in Rio de Janeiro, is expected to address key global challenges, with digital governance and misinformation regulation high on the agenda.

As the controversy unfolds, Musk’s terse online reactions and Janja’s bold statement have fueled debate over the growing influence of tech magnates and the responsibility of governments in regulating digital platforms.