Tuesday, August 4, 2026


Your Daily News Update About CALABARZON and Beyond.
ISSN 2799-1911

Home Blog Page 256

Hamas to free three Israeli hostages as Gaza ceasefire continues

GAZA/JERUSALEM. Palestinian militant group Hamas has announced that it will release three Israeli hostages on Saturday as part of a prisoner exchange deal, marking another step in ongoing ceasefire negotiations aimed at ending the 15-month war in Gaza.

The hostages set for release are Ohad Ben Ami and Eli Sharabi, who were taken from Kibbutz Be’eri during the October 7, 2023 cross-border Hamas-led attack, and Or Levy, who was abducted from the Nova music festival that same day. According to Hamas, the exchange will see Israel release 183 Palestinian prisoners, including 18 individuals serving life sentences and 111 detainees captured in Gaza during the war.

Masked and armed Hamas fighters have reportedly gathered in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza, where the handover will take place. The hostages will be transferred to the International Red Cross Committee, which will then deliver them to Israeli forces inside Gaza.

For the families of the hostages, who have been held incommunicado for over a year, the imminent release brings a mix of relief and overwhelming emotion.

“I can’t even start to describe the emotions, the excitement, how happy we are that it’s finally close to being over,” said Michael Levy, brother of Or Levy, who lost his wife in the October 7 attack and has a three-year-old son. “We are waiting to hug him, waiting to see Almog (Levy’s son) hugging his father again.”

This latest exchange follows previous swaps that have seen 13 Israeli and five Thai hostages freed in return for 583 Palestinian prisoners and detainees. The current 42-day ceasefire, brokered with U.S. support and mediated by Egypt and Qatar, has largely held since taking effect nearly three weeks ago.

However, concerns about the deal’s longevity have grown following a controversial statement by U.S. President Donald Trump, who suggested relocating Palestinians from Gaza and turning the enclave into the “Riviera of the Middle East.” His remarks were met with rejection from Arab states and Palestinian groups, who decried the proposal as a form of ethnic cleansing.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed Trump’s intervention, while Israel’s Defense Minister has reportedly ordered the military to explore options for Palestinians wishing to leave Gaza.

Under the current ceasefire agreement, 33 Israeli children, women, and vulnerable individuals are to be released in exchange for nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees during the initial phase. Negotiations for a second phase began this week, aiming to secure the return of the remaining hostages and discuss the full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza to pave the way for a permanent end to the conflict.

The war began when Hamas-led gunmen attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing approximately 1,200 people and taking over 250 hostages. In response, Israel launched a full-scale air and ground campaign in Gaza, which, according to Gaza health authorities, has resulted in the deaths of over 47,000 Palestinians and left much of the enclave in ruins.

As negotiations continue, both sides face pressure from international mediators to uphold the fragile ceasefire and work toward a resolution that could bring an end to the prolonged conflict. For now, the focus remains on the safe return of the remaining hostages and the fate of Palestinian detainees in Israeli custody.

Comelec urges public to scrutinize candidates’ SOCE for transparency

MANILA. The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has called on the public to closely examine the Statements of Contributions and Expenditures (SOCE) of candidates running in Eleksyon 2025, emphasizing the importance of transparency in campaign finances.

Comelec Chair George Garcia underscored the role of public scrutiny in verifying the accuracy of SOCE entries, as these documents will be made publicly available.

“Kailangan [makita ng tao ang SOCE] upang malaman kung talagang tama ba yung mga nire-report o baka mayroon silang hindi na-report mga gastusin. O kaya naman, may mga nagbigay na wala doon sa SOCE,” Garcia stated on the sidelines of GMA Integrated News’ Masterclass series on Saturday.

(It is important for the public to see the SOCE to determine whether the reported expenses are accurate or if there are unreported expenditures. There may also be donors who contributed but were not included in the SOCE.)

Garcia stressed that making SOCE accessible to the public ensures a broader counter-checking mechanism beyond the Comelec’s internal review. “Ganun ka-importante na andyan ‘yung SOCE, nakapublish, upang makounter-check ng hindi lang ng Comelec, kung hindi lang mga publiko,” he added.

(SOCE must be published so that not only Comelec but also the public can verify its contents.)

Despite its importance, Garcia admitted that SOCE has limitations, as it only accounts for campaign expenses incurred during the official campaign period, which lasts for two to three months. This excludes expenses made from the filing of candidacy, which takes place from October 1 to 8, as per a Supreme Court ruling.

“We have to comply with the ruling of the Supreme Court,” Garcia said.

Another challenge, according to Garcia, is the difficulty in detecting possible collusion between candidates and donors to underreport actual campaign expenditures.

“If they conspired, that would be very difficult to trace,” he noted.

Despite these challenges, Garcia emphasized that the SOCE serves as an important accountability tool to ensure that candidates adhere to election laws.

“What is important here is they have to submit the SOCE, because that is accountability. If a candidate goes around campaigning with disregard of the law, then you cannot expect anything out of that candidate if he or she gets elected,” Garcia pointed out.

Earlier, Garcia also announced that the Comelec is preparing a resolution that will presume celebrities and influencers endorsing candidates for Eleksyon 2025 are paid contractors, further reinforcing the commission’s efforts to ensure financial transparency in elections.

Monster radio jet discovered from one of the universe’s earliest quasars

0

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. Astronomers have detected an enormous radio jet streaming from a quasar dating back to the first billion years of the universe, making it the largest ever observed from such an early cosmic period.

According to a study published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, the double-sided radio wave jet spans at least 200,000 light-years, which is approximately twice the width of the Milky Way galaxy. This discovery is significant as such radio jets, while common in the nearby universe, have remained elusive in the early cosmos due to interference from the cosmic microwave background—the radiation left over from the Big Bang.

“It’s only because this object is so extreme that we can observe it from Earth, even though it’s really far away,” said Anniek Gloudemans of the National Science Foundation’s NoirLab, the lead author of the study.

The quasar responsible for this massive jet was first discovered just a few years ago and is estimated to have formed when the universe was only 9% of its current age, approximately within the first 1.2 billion years after the Big Bang. Quasars, among the brightest objects in the universe, are the luminous cores of galaxies powered by supermassive black holes that consume gas and dust, releasing immense energy in the process.

Observatories across Europe, Hawaii, and Texas contributed to the findings, using advanced telescopes to capture this rare cosmic phenomenon. The quasar’s black hole is estimated to have a mass of 450 million times that of the Sun, yet it is not considered particularly massive compared to other quasars of similar brightness.

The detection of this radio jet challenges previous assumptions about the formation and evolution of quasars and black holes in the early universe. Scientists believe studying such powerful jets can provide crucial insights into how galaxies and black holes grew during the universe’s infancy.

With further advancements in radio astronomy and next-generation telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope, researchers hope to uncover even more about the mysterious, high-energy processes shaping the cosmos in its earliest stages.

How will Philippine VP Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial unfold?

0

MANILA. The Philippine House of Representatives has impeached Vice President Sara Duterte, daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, paving the way for a rare and high-profile impeachment trial in the Senate.

Here is a breakdown of how the trial will proceed, past impeachment cases in the country, and the constitutional process that follows:

How Will the Trial Be Conducted?

The House of Representatives has appointed members who will serve as prosecutors in the trial. The Senate will then convene as an impeachment court, with Senate President Francis Escudero presiding. Duterte will have the right to legal defense, and the 24 senators will act as judges who will decide the case.

When Will the Trial Begin?

Although the impeachment complaint was transmitted to the Senate on February 5, the upper house can only act on it starting June 2, when Congress resumes session after the May 2025 midterm elections. This was confirmed by Senate President Escudero, as 12 out of 24 Senate seats will be contested in the upcoming election.

What Are the Charges Against Vice President Duterte?

The impeachment complaint accuses Duterte of violating the Constitution, graft and corruption, other high crimes, and betrayal of public trust. Specifically, she is alleged to have:

  • Misused public funds while serving as Vice President and Education Secretary
  • Amassed unexplained wealth
  • Threatened the lives of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and House Speaker Martin Romualdez

Duterte has repeatedly denied these allegations, maintaining that she has done nothing wrong.

How Long Will the Trial Last?

There is no fixed duration for an impeachment trial in the Philippines. The length will depend on several factors, including the complexity of the case, the number of witnesses, and the volume of evidence presented. For comparison, the 2012 impeachment trial of the late Chief Justice Renato Corona lasted five months.

What Is Required to Convict an Impeached Official?

A conviction in an impeachment trial requires a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. This means that at least 16 out of 24 senators must vote in favor of conviction.

What Happens If Duterte Is Convicted?

If convicted, Duterte would be removed from office and permanently barred from holding any future government position, effectively ending any potential bid for the presidency.

Who Will Succeed Duterte as Vice President?

If Duterte is removed from office, President Marcos Jr. will nominate a successor from among the members of the Senate or House of Representatives. The nominee must then be confirmed by a majority vote in both chambers, voting separately.

How Many Officials Have Been Impeached in the Philippines?

Sara Duterte is the fifth top official in Philippine history to face impeachment. The previous cases include:

  • Former President Joseph Estrada (2000) – His trial was aborted after prosecutors walked out.
  • Former Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez (2011) – Resigned before trial.
  • Former Chief Justice Renato Corona (2012) – Convicted and removed from office.
  • Former Commission on Elections (COMELEC) Chairman Andres Bautista (2017) – Resigned after impeachment.

Duterte’s impeachment trial is set to be a significant political event, with potential implications for the 2028 presidential elections and the country’s broader political landscape.

With reports from Reuters.

77 produkto, may taas-presyo sa bagong SRP bulletin ng DTI

MAYNILA. Inilabas ng Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) nitong Huwebes ang pinakabagong Suggested Retail Price (SRP) bulletin para sa mga pangunahing pangangailangan at bilihin, higit isang taon matapos ang huling update nito noong Enero 12, 2023.

Batay sa datos ng DTI, mula sa 191 shelf-keeping units (SKUs) na kasama sa bagong listahan ng SRP, 77 produkto o 40% ng mga ito ang nagtaas ng presyo.

Kabilang sa mga basic necessities at prime commodities na nagkaroon ng pagtaas sa SRP ay:

  • Canned sardines (7 items)
  • Gatas – condensed (1), evaporated (1), powdered (1)
  • Kape – refill (5), 3-in-1 (4)
  • Tinapay (2)
  • Instant noodles (3)
  • Kandila (5)
  • Luncheon meat (1), meat loaf (1), corned beef (4), beef loaf (3)
  • Asin (6)
  • Bottled water (5)
  • Condiments (15)
  • Toilet soap (6)
  • Detergent at laundry soap (6)
  • Battery (1)

Mga Halaga ng Pagtaas

  • Ang canned sardines ay may pagtaas sa pagitan ng 5% hanggang 15%, o mula P0.02 hanggang P2.73 para sa isang 155-gramong lata.
  • Ang gatas ay tumaas ng 6% hanggang 10%, o mula P2.50 hanggang P6, depende sa brand at unit.
  • Ang kape ay may pagtaas na 6% hanggang 11%, o mula P0.45 hanggang P2.20.
  • Ang instant noodles naman ay nagkaroon ng pagtaas na 1% hanggang 7%, o mula P0.10 hanggang P0.50.

Walang Paggalaw sa Presyo ng Tinapay

Nanatiling pareho ang presyo ng Pinoy Pandesal at Pinoy Tasty mula sa SRP bulletin noong Pebrero 8, 2023. Gayunpaman, sa pinakahuling update, tumaas ang SRP ng 250g Pinoy Pandesal at 450g Pinoy Tasty mula P2.25 hanggang P3.50.

May Bumaba ang Presyo, Pero Kakaunti

Anim na produkto ang nagbaba ng kanilang SRP, kabilang ang de-latang sardinas (2 items) at bottled water (4 items). Ang pagbaba sa SRP ng canned sardines ay nasa P0.10, habang ang bottled water ay bumaba ng hanggang P3.

Samantala, may 108 produkto na nanatili ang kanilang SRP.

‘Shrinkflation’ Sa Ilang Produkto

Upang manatiling mapagkumpitensya sa merkado, ilang brands ang hindi nagtaas ng presyo ngunit nagpatupad ng “shrinkflation”, o pagbabawas ng dami ng produkto habang pinapanatili ang parehong presyo.

  • 9 produkto ang nabawasan ang kanilang timbang o dami ngunit nanatili ang SRP.
  • 1 produkto ang nabawasan ang unit at pinanatili ang presyo.
  • 1 produkto ang dinagdagan ang unit upang ipakita ang pagtaas ng presyo.

Ayon sa DTI, regular nilang nire-review ang SRP upang tiyakin ang patas na presyo para sa mga mamimili habang isinasaalang-alang ang mga gastos ng mga manufacturer.

“Sinisikap natin na mapanatili ang balanse sa pagitan ng kapakanan ng mga consumer at ang kinakailangang pagtaas sa presyo ng mga produkto dahil sa pagtaas ng production costs,” pahayag ng ahensya.

Egypt opposes Trump’s plan to relocate Palestinians as Israel prepares for implementation

CAIRO. Egypt has launched a diplomatic campaign against a controversial proposal by former U.S. President Donald Trump to relocate Palestinians from Gaza, warning that the plan could destabilize the region and threaten its long-standing peace treaty with Israel. Meanwhile, Israel has begun preparations for the mass departure of Palestinians, despite widespread international opposition.

Trump’s administration initially presented the plan as a permanent resettlement but later softened its stance, claiming that the relocation would be temporary. However, officials have yet to provide concrete details.

In a social media post on Thursday, Trump stated that Palestinians would be “resettled in far safer and more beautiful communities, with new and modern homes,” and that the United States would take charge of Gaza’s redevelopment. He emphasized that no American troops would be needed for this effort. Hours later, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio reaffirmed that the relocations would be temporary, with Palestinians staying “somewhere else in the interim” while Gaza is rebuilt.

Palestinian and Regional Backlash

Palestinians have vehemently rejected Trump’s proposal, fearing they will never be allowed to return. Egypt has strongly opposed the plan, calling it a “blatant violation” of international law and warning that it could undermine ceasefire negotiations and peace efforts across the Middle East.

“This behavior provokes the return of hostilities and poses risks on the entire region and the foundations of peace,” the Egyptian government stated on Thursday.

Saudi Arabia, a key U.S. ally, has also denounced any mass displacement of Palestinians, linking its rejection to the broader issue of Palestinian statehood. Riyadh insists that normalization of relations with Israel—a major goal of Trump’s foreign policy—will not occur without the creation of a Palestinian state that includes Gaza.

Despite Israel and Trump’s insistence that the proposed relocation is voluntary, Palestinians across the political spectrum have vowed to remain in their homeland. Human Rights Watch and other organizations have condemned the plan, arguing that it constitutes “ethnic cleansing.”

Israel Begins Preparations Amid Uncertainty

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced on Thursday that he has directed the military to prepare for the mass emigration of Palestinians through land crossings, as well as “special arrangements for exit by sea and air.” However, there were no immediate signs of such preparations on the ground.

Israeli officials have not disclosed how they would respond if Palestinians refuse to leave, leaving significant uncertainty around the plan’s feasibility.

Egypt’s Diplomatic Push

Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi has not publicly responded to Trump’s proposal, which aims to relocate Gaza’s 2.3 million residents and place the U.S. in charge of reconstruction. However, behind the scenes, Egypt has been engaging in intense diplomatic efforts to block the initiative.

Egyptian officials, speaking anonymously, revealed that Cairo has communicated its opposition to the Pentagon, the State Department, and members of the U.S. Congress. The message has also been conveyed to Israel and key European allies, including Britain, France, and Germany.

A Western diplomat in Cairo, also speaking anonymously, confirmed that Egypt views the plan as a direct threat to its national security and has delivered strong objections through multiple channels. Egypt had previously rejected similar proposals from the Biden administration and European governments, but Trump’s public endorsement of the idea has intensified diplomatic tensions.

Hamas, which still controls much of Gaza, has condemned the proposal, warning that any U.S. takeover of the territory would be considered an occupation. The militant group has not yet indicated whether this dispute will affect ongoing ceasefire negotiations, including the next scheduled exchange of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners on Saturday.

Regional Unity Against Forced Relocation

When Trump first announced his proposal, he described it as a way to permanently relocate most of Gaza’s population to other countries, allowing the U.S. to transform the territory into a “Riviera of the Middle East.” Egyptian officials, however, have dismissed the notion that relocation is necessary for reconstruction, reiterating their commitment to the creation of a Palestinian state encompassing Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem.

Israel, which opposes Palestinian statehood, has insisted on maintaining open-ended security control over Gaza and the West Bank. It has also formally annexed East Jerusalem, which remains unrecognized by most of the international community.

Last week, Egypt hosted a high-level meeting with top diplomats from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. These countries, all of which have played a role in past U.S.-brokered agreements with Israel, collectively rejected any forced transfer of Palestinians from Gaza or the West Bank.

In an editorial on Thursday, Egypt’s state-run newspaper, Al-Ahram, warned that “the Arab countries’ independence, their peoples’ unity, and their territorial integrity are under grave threat.”

As tensions rise, Egypt’s strong opposition to Trump’s plan underscores the broader regional resistance to any mass displacement of Palestinians, reinforcing the growing diplomatic divide over Gaza’s future.

Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte impeached over assassination remarks and corruption allegations

MANILA. Vice President Sara Duterte of the Philippines was impeached on Wednesday, facing serious accusations including a plot to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., widespread corruption, and failure to strongly condemn China’s actions in the South China Sea. The impeachment deepens the rift between Duterte and Marcos, two of the country’s most prominent political figures.

The impeachment was spearheaded by legislators in the House of Representatives, many of whom are loyal to Marcos. This move highlights the ongoing political discord between the two leaders, who ran on a platform of unity in the 2022 elections. Duterte, the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, has repeatedly clashed with Marcos and his family, accusing them of corruption, weak leadership, and suppressing her potential bid for the presidency in 2028.

In total, 215 legislators signed the impeachment complaint, surpassing the threshold required to send the petition to the Senate, which would serve as a tribunal for her trial. Among the signatories were President Marcos’s son, Representative Sandro Marcos, and House Speaker Martin Romualdez. The petition called for the Senate to shift into an impeachment court, convict Duterte, remove her from office, and bar her from holding any future public office.

The complaint alleges that Duterte’s actions have “clearly displayed gross faithlessness against public trust” and her “gross unfitness to hold public office.” It also accuses her of a “tyrannical abuse of power” during her time in office.

The impeachment primarily focuses on a controversial statement made by Duterte in November 2023, in which she suggested that she had contracted an assassin to kill Marcos, his wife, and Romualdez if she were to be killed. Although Duterte later clarified that she was not threatening them, the comment sparked national security concerns and led to an investigation.

In addition to the assassination remarks, Duterte faces allegations of corruption and misuse of her office’s funds. A House investigation revealed the alleged misuse of 612.5 million pesos ($10.5 million) in confidential and intelligence funds allocated to her office while serving as vice president and education secretary. The investigation also pointed to unexplained wealth and her failure to disclose assets as required by law.

The impeachment petition also criticized Duterte for undermining the Marcos administration’s policies, particularly in relation to the South China Sea disputes. The vice president’s remarks calling the government’s handling of territorial disputes with China a “fiasco” and her silence on China’s aggressive actions in the region were noted as key points of contention.

The complaint also described Duterte’s “evasiveness and silence” on the West Philippine Sea issue as being in stark contrast to her vocal stance on other matters.

Duterte has yet to respond publicly to the impeachment but her brother, Representative Paolo Duterte, called the move a “clear act of political persecution” aimed at sidelining her. He criticized rival lawmakers for quickly gathering signatures and pushing what he called a “baseless impeachment case” to the Senate.

The impeachment of Vice President Duterte marks a new chapter in the ongoing political drama that continues to unfold in the Philippines as tensions rise between two of the country’s most powerful political families.

PH embassy sa Japan nagbabala sa pagdami ng kaso ng influenza

Nagbabala ang Philippine Embassy sa Japan sa mga Pilipinong naninirahan at bumibiyahe sa bansa kaugnay ng pagtaas ng kaso ng influenza o trangkaso.

Ayon sa embahada, dapat magsuot ng face mask ang mga Pilipino, lalo na sa matataong lugar at pampublikong transportasyon, upang maprotektahan ang sarili laban sa virus. Pinayuhan din ang mga biyahero na kumuha ng travel insurance bilang paghahanda sakaling magkaroon ng hindi inaasahang gastusing medikal.

Bukod dito, pinaalalahanan ang mga Pilipino na manatiling updated sa mga pampublikong abiso at manatili sa bahay kung makakaranas ng sintomas ng trangkaso.

Para sa mga emerhensiya, maaaring tawagan ang:
📍 Philippine Embassy sa Tokyo – 080-4928-7979
📍 Consulate General sa Osaka – 090-4036-7984
📍 Consulate General sa Nagoya – 090-6580-6724

Patuloy na pinaaalalahanan ang lahat na mag-ingat at sumunod sa mga health protocols upang maiwasan ang lalo pang pagkalat ng sakit.

Samantala, nagdadalamhati ang entertainment industry matapos pumanaw ang sikat na Taiwanese actress na bumida sa seryeng Meteor Garden. Ayon sa mga ulat, nagkasakit siya ng influenza matapos bumiyahe ang kanyang pamilya sa Japan, at kalaunan ay nagkaroon ng malalang komplikasyon na naging sanhi ng kanyang pagkamatay. Ang kanyang biglaang pagkawala ay nagdulot ng matinding lungkot sa kanyang mga tagahanga sa buong mundo.

Trump’s Gaza takeover proposal sparks global backlash

WASHINGTON/CAIRO. The Trump administration faced intense international criticism following President Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to relocate Palestinians out of Gaza and initiate a U.S.-led reconstruction of the war-ravaged enclave. While his top aides defended the plan, they also softened some elements in response to widespread condemnation.

Trump, a former New York property mogul, triggered sharp rebukes from world powers, including Russia, China, and Germany, with German officials warning that the plan would cause “new suffering and new hatred.” Saudi Arabia outright rejected the proposal.

In a White House statement on Tuesday, Trump outlined his vision of turning Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East,” emphasizing international cooperation in rebuilding the territory after 16 months of Israeli bombardment that has left over 47,000 Palestinians dead, according to local authorities.

White House Clarifies Stance

At a briefing on Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the plan as “historic, outside-of-the-box thinking.” However, she clarified that the U.S. was not committing to deploying “boots on the ground” in Gaza but refused to rule out potential military involvement.

Additionally, Leavitt walked back Trump’s initial suggestion of permanently resettling Gazans in neighboring countries, stating that any relocations would be “temporary” for reconstruction purposes. Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed this sentiment, saying the intention was for Gazans to leave the territory only for an “interim” period to facilitate rebuilding efforts.

Despite the adjustments, many critics questioned whether Trump was serious about the proposal or merely using it as a bargaining tool. His first term saw a pattern of extreme foreign policy pronouncements, many of which were never implemented.

Global and Domestic Opposition

Trump’s son-in-law and former adviser, Jared Kushner, previously described Gaza as valuable waterfront property, an idea Trump reiterated on Tuesday while advocating for the permanent resettlement of over two million Palestinians.

Critics argue that the proposal could violate international law and human rights, with some describing it as “ethnic cleansing.”

“Everybody loves it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, though polling data suggests that most Americans oppose further military entanglements in conflict zones after long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Reactions from lawmakers varied. Democratic legislators denounced the plan, while some Republicans voiced skepticism. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) posted on X (formerly Twitter), “I thought we voted for America first. We have no business contemplating yet another occupation to doom our treasure and spill our soldiers’ blood.”

During a visit to Guatemala, Secretary Rubio framed the proposal as a “generous” move demonstrating “the willingness of the United States to become responsible for the reconstruction of that area.” In contrast, Leavitt stated that U.S. taxpayers would not fund the rebuilding, claiming Trump would strike deals with regional partners.

Middle East Reaction and Palestinian Resistance

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who met with U.S. Vice President JD Vance on Wednesday, did not directly address Trump’s proposal but praised the president for considering new approaches. Jordan’s King Abdullah, set to meet with Trump next week, rejected any attempts to displace Palestinians.

Egypt, which brokered a ceasefire on January 19, signaled support for Gaza’s reconstruction but insisted that Palestinians must not be forced to leave the territory.

In Gaza, residents expressed outrage. “Trump can go to hell, with his ideas, with his money, and with his beliefs. We are going nowhere. We are not some of his assets,” said Samir Abu Basel, a father of five displaced by the war.

U.S. Military Considerations and International Law

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicated that the Pentagon was exploring “all options” regarding Gaza, leading analysts to speculate that any implementation of Trump’s plan would require a significant U.S. military presence in the region.

Hamas, which governed Gaza before the conflict, dismissed Trump’s proposal as “ridiculous and absurd.” Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri warned, “Any ideas of this kind are capable of igniting the region.” The group remains committed to its ceasefire agreement with Israel but continues to negotiate terms for the next phase of the truce.

Trump’s proposal also raises questions about Saudi Arabia’s willingness to engage in U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to normalize relations with Israel. The kingdom’s foreign ministry reaffirmed its commitment to Palestinian statehood and rejected any forced displacement of Palestinians.

Israeli far-right politician Itamar Ben-Gvir supported Trump’s suggestion, urging Netanyahu to adopt a policy of encouraging Palestinian emigration from Gaza “immediately.”

Secretary-General António Guterres cautioned against reckless proposals at a United Nations committee meeting: “In the search for solutions, we must not make the problem worse. It is vital to stay true to the bedrock of international law. It is essential to avoid any form of ‘ethnic cleansing.’”

As Trump’s proposal continues to face scrutiny, its feasibility remains uncertain, and its potential geopolitical consequences could reshape U.S. involvement in the Middle East for years to come.

Kandidatong congressman sa Laguna inaresto

CALAMBA CITY, Laguna. Dinampot ng mga awtoridad ang isang negosyante na tumatakbo bilang kongresista sa Calamba City, Laguna para sa 2025 midterm elections habang dumadalo sa isang pagdinig sa Municipal Hall of Justice nitong Lunes ng umaga.

Kinilala ang inarestong suspek na si Eugiene Salom, 37, alyas “Gino,” na mas kilala sa bansag na “Batang Calamba” ng kanyang mga tagasuporta. Ayon kay Lt. Col. Victor Sobrepeña, hepe ng Calamba Police Station, hindi na nanlaban si Salom nang siya’y arestuhin bandang 9:30 AM sa harap ng Municipal Trial Court, Branch 3 sa Barangay Real, Calamba City.

Ang pag-aresto ay isinagawa sa bisa ng warrant of arrest na inilabas ni Hon. Krisandra Ann Del Mundo Malalauan, acting presiding judge ng MTC, Branch 3, Fourth Judicial Region, Calamba City noong Enero 30, 2025. Inakusahan si Salom ng paglabag sa Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 o Bouncing Checks Law.

Batay sa ulat ng pulisya, si Salom ay nakalista bilang Number 8 City Level Most Wanted Person, at may itinakdang piyansang ₱120,000 para sa kanyang pansamantalang kalayaan.

“Nasa kustodiya na natin ang akusado at sumasailalim sa booking procedure,” ayon kay Sobrepeña. Matapos ang proseso, agad namang nagpiyansa si Salom upang makalaya pansamantala.

Samantala, sa isang panayam sa telepono, mariing itinanggi ni Salom ang paratang laban sa kanya at iginiit na ang pag-aresto sa kanya ay bahagi ng “maruming pulitika.”